- Ah, what a great idea – the Bad Hack blog. The PR industry gets its chance to bite back by mentioning the awful hacks they’ve endured. (British too. Excellent.) And hey, why shouldn’t it?
Then again, they might need to raise their game ever so slightly. I know that one of them refers to Chris Youett, and was already legendary when I started in the game 20 years ago.
- FAQ: Intelligent Design, Designer, Irreducible Complexity and Irreducibly Comple…
Q. I’ve heard that there isn’t really a scientific controversy, that 99+% of biologists take evolution as a given in their work. Is that true?
A. No, there really is a raging controversy, but most biologists don’t know it because they only read “accepted”, “peer-reviewed”, or “good” scientific journals. And while it may be true that “most” biologists accept evolution, we do have several on our side, along with lots of scientists from other fields of study like engineering and computer science, and thousands of ministers, politicians, and creationist homeschool teachers.
And if you replace “evolution” with “climate change” and “creationist” with “oil-dependent” then you get much the same effect..