Charles on... anything that comes along

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.charlesarthur.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/14/in-the-guardian-reviewing-musicstation/trackback/

  1. £2 a week sounds good. I’d enjoy being able to listen to the whole thing; better than iTunes’ 30-second previews.

    I still don’t buy the term “subscription” though. It’s rental, surely?

    Comment by pauldwaite — Thursday 14 February 2008 @ 10:49 pm

  2. @paul: subscription, rental - nearly the same thing. Subscription (I read it) is where you subscribe to a service and you get stuff through that service. Rental would be renting the individual tracks - which would have an incremental price for each track. Not much of a distinction, really, but I think subscription is more accurate.

    Comment by Charles — Thursday 14 February 2008 @ 11:27 pm

  3. @Charles “I think subscription is more accurate”. I think not. If I subscribe to a magazine, it turns up regularly and I get to keep it. If I rent a car I don’t get to keep it. This really sound like rental radio (now where have I heard that before?) like the satellite broadcasters Sirius and XM in the US.

    Comment by EMComments — Friday 15 February 2008 @ 12:37 am

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


Close this window.

0.133 Powered by Wordpress