You could be seeing a great picture here
_

Charles on… anything that comes along

Monday 23 August 2004

Filed under: — Charles @ 4:40 pm

The third Swift boat officer speaks up - in Kerry’s favour

Heard all the junk from people suggesting John Kerry didn’t deserve his Silver Star? Now, the only other surviving officer from the day says what happened, in `This is what I saw that day’ (free registration required - doesn’t take long).

So happens he’s an editor at the Chicago Tribune, who has never wanted to talk more about it, but feels goaded by the flat-out lies being told. The skinny: Kerry carried out a tactic that worked, got congratulated, and by the way, war is hell.

The tactic was to attack the VietCong who would launch ambushes on the (noisy) Swift boats as they came upriver. Rather than carrying on, Kerry pre-agreed a tactic of attacking the ambushers.

Interesting extracts: John O’Neill, author of a highly critical account of Kerry’s Vietnam service, describes the man Kerry chased as a “teenager” in a “loincloth.” I have no idea how old the gunner Kerry chased that day was, but both Leeds and I recall that he was a grown man, dressed in the kind of garb the VC usually wore.
The man Kerry chased was not the “lone” attacker at that site, as O’Neill suggests. There were others who fled. There was also firing from the tree line well behind the spider holes and at one point, from the opposite riverbank as well. It was not the work of just one attacker.

And: Known over radio circuits by the call sign “Latch,” then-Capt. and now retired Rear Adm. Roy Hoffmann, the task force commander, fired off a message congratulating the three swift boats, saying at one point that the tactic of charging the ambushes was a “shining example of completely overwhelming the enemy” and that it “may be the most efficacious method of dealing with small numbers of ambushers.”
Hoffmann has become a leading critic of Kerry’s and now says that what the boats did on that day demonstrated Kerry’s inclination to be impulsive to a fault. (How unfortunate for Hoffmann that he can now be shown to be two-faced.)

It’s the coda to the feature which makes the strongest points though: The survivors of all these events are scattered across the country now. Jerry Leeds lives in a tiny Kansas town where he built and sold a successful printing business. He owns a beautiful home with a lawn that sweeps to the edge of a small lake, which he also owns. Every year, flights of purple martins return to the stately birdhouses on the tall poles in his back yard. Cueva, recently retired, has raised three daughters and is beloved by his neighbors for all the years he spent keeping their cars running. Lee is a senior computer programmer in Kentucky, and Lamberson finished a second military career in the Army.

In other words - sent to fight in a stupid war that wasted lives. In all the rows over peoples’ military records, it’s worth recalling that it wasn’t the soldiers who decided to go to war.

Filed under: — Charles @ 3:35 pm

Quiz: know your online security?

Neat little quiz at this site - quick things like “A software firewall provides adequate protection for a cable or DSL line - True/False” and “Chat rooms and the Internet have become the primary way that sexual predators find victims today - True/False”.

Well, do you know? It’s a fun five minutes. (I got 91.7% - cursed identity thieves!)

Filed under: — Charles @ 3:21 pm

Rob Scoble: bravery in the face of the hordes

Certainly have to say that Rob Scoble never saw a parapet he didn’t want to stick his head over for a look-see. Here’s his take on online security and how to maximise it.

There are 14 points, all good - if you’re running Windows. But if you’re not (as many passing commenters are not, instead gleefully using OSX), then most of the 14 don’t apply.

Specifically: you don’t need antivirus (no, OSX has not had any viruses or worms, only a couple of prove-it Trojans), anti-spyware, a two-way firewall (because the NAT/router you’re urged to get later will do), Win XP SP2, the latest web or email clients (whatever you like suffices, generally), don’t need to visit Microsoft.com/security regularly, nor turn off ActiveX and scripting when you visit “high-risk” (=pr0n) sites. (You’ll not have ActiveX anyway on non-MS machines.)

What’s left from his list? A NAT-style firewall (wireless router will do), good passwords, regular backups, running as a non-admin user, and keeping anonymous users off wireless nets. That’s five things, of which four are free.

Remind me again about the cost benefits of Windows? All the time spent hunting down the anti-spyware stuff, choosing AV software, switching ActiveX scripting on and off, could be better spent just using the damn thing, seems to me.

You know, for something productive, like blogging.

Filed under: — Charles @ 1:56 pm

Any John Brunner experts out there?

Could anyone point me to a meaningful biography of the man who wrote Shockwave Rider and many others?

To define “meaningful” - I’d quite like it to include works like “The Web of Everywhere” (which wasn’t about the Web, since you wonder). Or if anyone happens to have some expert knowledge on Brunner, that’d be welcome too. Of course I’ll try his publisher, etc, but just in case..

Filed under: — Charles @ 12:42 pm

Now with more space to comment into!

In response to Rupert’s request here, the comments window is now much bigger for your erudite replies. Use it for good, not evil.

Powered by WordPress