What the US needs now: a strong third party
Watching the BBC’s Question Time, which is coming from the US, in a move that the producers no doubt thought would be smart - with Michael Moore, David Frum (ex-GWB speechwriter), coupla other Americans, and the UK’s Richard Littlejohn; the latter usually thought of as a corrosive commentator. In this company, particularly the audience’s, Littlejohn is just drowned out, too nice to bother with.
It’s awful. Nasty, vituperative, bitter, divisive, a dialogue of the deaf. The audience cheers and jeers, and the reason why the whole debate is so sterile - in the manner of razed ground - is that there’s only two sides. Heads or tails, black or white. There’s no credible third party offering the risk of an alternative, in the way that the Liberal Democrats do in the UK, able to call the bluff on both parties, and win votes from either. People are on one side or the other.
Sometimes, it turns out, you need a fence.
- These posts might be related (the database thinks..):
- Live, PR, live in the 21st century (19 November 2010; score: 33.19%)
- After Google Talk, an instant messaging war on the offing? (1 September 2005; score: 28.64%)
- Shorthand, obsolete? I think not (10 March 2008; score: 27.14%)



