Yeah, what he said
Seth Finkelstein has a rather nice pre-emptive strike on the issue of pre-emptive articles about what the Supreme Court’s decision on Grokster (PDF - go read it yourself) means.
When the court’s decision finally is released, to a first approximation, there can’t be more than about a dozen things to say about the result. The top three being:1) Industry wins, civil-libertarians say “Bad”, analysis: Court slap “pirates”.
2) Industry loses, civil-libertarians say “Good”, analysis: Congress will pass new law, slap “pirates”.
3) Muddled decision, Industry, civil-libertarians say “Good/Bad”, analysis: Some say congress should pass new law, slap “pirates”?All that remains is to fill in the details (the fastest pundits may have already half-written articles set to go, with just the relevant quotes to add).
So, as a matter of mathematics, the number of people trying to say something about this, vastly outnumbers the basic number of things to say. The insight of power-laws is that the distribution won’t be uniform. Sure, anyone can write about it - but there isn’t much of a reason to read what anyone writes. Blog-evangelists consistently neglect this factor. Not to mention the relative privilege necessary to be able to take the time to spend pouring over a document and writing analysis.
Basically he’s saying “You’ve read three blogs, now move on and Get A Life, OK?” (BTW it’s poring, Seth.)
Finkelstein is an interesting person, with interesting things to say; subscribe now!
- These posts might be related (the database thinks..):
- Yeah, that might be a bug in Microsoft Word. Just, you know, guessing (20 March 2006; score: 19.14%)
- So howcome we don't hear about citizen doctors, citizen lawyers, citizen architects... (10 May 2008; score: 19.03%)
- The Baby Einstein piracy swizz (11 July 2007; score: 18.99%)



