In the Independent: Amazon is ten. Imagine if they’d got it wrong…
In The Independent this week, I’ve written about Amazon’s tenth birthday.
While the NYT preferred to concentrate on the money side (which is understandable), I’ve looked at the impact Amazon.com had on web use.
Here’s the things to be thankful for: they had terrific usability right from the start. Imagine if they’d got it wrong. Bezos’s breakthrough (I argue) wasn’t selling books online - anyone could have thought of that. It was having great, streamlined design at a time when “online shopping” was still an oxymoron.
And some sites still haven’t learned the lessons that Amazon laid down even then. To see what I mean, try going to Amazon.co.uk and Interflora.co.uk. Visit both as an *unregistered* user - don’t sign in to either if you’re a member. Try keeping two windows side by side, so you can compare the process.
Now try to buy something. Just click and keep trying to proceed to the checkout. At Interflora, you’ll hit what seems like a roadblock; at precisely the same point, Amazon gives you an easy passage towards spending your money.
(Whether or not you now choose to actually spend your money is up to you, of course, though I can recommend this one - as seen on TV.
Of course Amazon hasn’t paid any dividends, so its price/earnings ratio is literally infinite, though you could calculate how much its EPS is, and make a guess at the PER. Even so, buying the stock is only for those looking to trade it.
- These posts might be related (the database thinks..):
- The long tail, best gadgets for Xmas, and how a Canadian island may foretell the fate of the Amazon (1 December 2004; score: 56.63%)
- Done a book review on Amazon? .... oh, so you have (18 November 2005; score: 51.96%)
- That "independent investigation" into MPs' expenses? It's already going on (21 May 2009; score: 45.84%)



