Tim Allan, white courtesy phone please
Browsing the online pages of UK Press Gazette (which I don’t much; no web feeds that I can find) I came across this amazing episode where a broadcaster said ministers lie all the time.
But it wasn’t that bloke Humphrys. (He only said some don’t tell all the truth.)
No:
Take these quotes from a broadcast news political editor, in a session at the Edinburgh Festival: “Tony Blair lied to me… John Reid lied over the NHS… They [politicians] all lie absolutely consistently.”
So was the author of these remarks, Sky’s Adam Boulton, treated to hysterical calls for high-level inquiries and covered with heaps of ordure? Er, no. His remarks weren’t reported anywhere, even though they were made in front of an audience of journalists.
And nobody saw fit to ‘leak’ the transcript to The Times, either, as a certain Tim Allan did with the Humphrys speech. Allan then used the Times story as a hook for a piece highly critical of confrontational political broadcast journalism.
Which makes it all the more strange that the Boulton remarks didn’t get any play. For to whom was he speaking on the Edinburgh stage? Step forward, Tim Allan - Sky’s former PR, who remains on some kind of contract with the broadcaster.
The whole thing stank. What’s worst is that the BBC couldn’t win in the Humphrys thing: if they ignored it, The Times would spin it on and on, but if they give him a tap on the wrist, it’s held up as some great telling-off. Hmm, The Times..
- These posts might be related (the database thinks..):
- Paging Beverley Head, white courtesy phone please.. (10 August 2005; score: 70.19%)
- Gillian McKeith, white courtesy phone please (30 September 2004; score: 51.33%)
- Apple sues Think Secret over headless iMac and iWork: yeah, but try finding them (5 January 2005; score: 50.74%)




September 15th, 2005 at 12:39 pm
Yes, it’s not really fair perhaps (another example of the dominance of the Murdoch empire). But I have to say, I did quite enjoy Humphry’s getting a b******ing. I’d switched off the Today programme a few years back, primarily because he was getting to me. His treatment of science issues for instance (MMR, GM, etc) was driving me mad. And given that he has espoused views on some of those issues publicly, it was clear he was no longer acting as an unbiased commentator.
September 15th, 2005 at 7:33 pm
UK Press Gazette has a feed:
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/rss.php